Papers: {#papers}¶

• http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07690 : About the core/cusp problem. Applying observation-like procedure to numerical simulations to derive rotation curves of simulated galaxies could lead to mix up cores and cusps. This paper will be discussed again in detailed by Albert later.

• http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06668 : Numerical simulations of clusters. Comparison of different codes (SPH,AMR) and differents recipies for baryonic physics (star formation, AFN feedbacks ...). No definitite answer for example on the central slope og the dark matter halo : scatter between codes and more between differents subgrid physics schemes.

• http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06764 : A re-analysis of FERMI data in the galactic center direction reveal a bipolar morphology of the signal. A strong argument against a dark matter emission interpretation of the GeV excess (other solutions being nearby pulsars).

• http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05957 : The usual argument that baryonic physics (star formation, SN feedbacks) in cosmological simulations could accomadate LCDM with the satellites problems (missing satelites and too big to fail). They show this with the FIRE simulation (one of the best at the moment).